Sex dolls vs. real women: Who to choose for better Sex Life

The other day you came across a story about a brothel in America whose offer was not real women, but silicone dolls. This type of doll considered “sex toys” are made with materials that allow a realistic finish as possible. The sex dolls are molded following the prototype of “perfect woman” physically under the social canon that governs and marks the ideal of beauty according to masculine tastes; that is, women with large breasts, small sizes, large eyes, large mouth, marked hips and perfectly sexualized to meet the most depraved and violent desires of consumers.

It is not the only brothel or the only country in which this business belonging to the sex industry has tried to break through. The establishment opened its doors with a variety of four sex doll with different features; a doll with Asian features, another with a European profile, another with African features and a Japanese anime doll. These dolls are made with thermoplastic elastomer to ensure maximum credibility to the touch. The price of these silicone dolls ranges between 80 dollars and 150 dollars depending on the time hired for the service. Canada, France or Colombia, are another example of countries that have this type of establishments directed mostly to the male public.

It is incredibly disturbing to realize the cost of having sex with these dolls, being higher than many “sexual services” with real women. What is the cost of having sex dolls? Find out below.

What price does a woman have? Is the mere fact of putting a price on it not derogatory enough?

Some people think that it is only sexual toys functionally designed to fulfill the unfathomable fantasies of the clients arguing that, in this way, the degradation that occurs in the exercise of prostitution would be avoided; However, this does not stop being the confirmation that there is real violence towards prostituted women. If there were no such violence, would this kind of brothels be necessary? The answer seems clear.

That the merchandise in this case is an object and not a person, is not a reason for justification, it evidences the verifiable duality of the position of the woman as a material piece.

A critical position against the opening of these spaces can be crossed as a sample of puritanism, after all it is only about fantasies and you cannot put doors to the field, but zoophilia is not also a taboo based on sexual desire? Why are there no brothels of dogs and cats, real or silicone, to fulfill these desires? Looking for information I find a story related to Denmark estimating that 17% of domestic animals had symptoms of sexual abuse.

The note makes reference to that less than five years ago Germany and Sweden banned and punished sexual practices with animals. Norway, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom did the same in the first decade of the 21st century, while Spain was the last country to close the door to bestiality in 2015. The defenders of this type of practices consider that “giving love” to animals are emotionally positive for their sexual health and do not contemplate animal exploitation in their actions, an argument not very different from that of millions of prostitution clients. It is very significant that bestiality is considered disgusting and inadmissible, in the same way that it would be if animals were represented in the form of silicone dolls in legalized brothels.

If someone imagines that splitting the vagina to a doll is a pleasant sexual desire, it has a very serious problem. If someone believes that having sex with sex dolls would reduce the number of rapes women would be denying sexual violence. There are no brothels of animals for leisure and enjoyment because it is sick, degrading and inhuman and is punishable; It exists with dolls and prostitutes because women are considered second class citizens at the service of masculine desires and the most ferocious capitalism.

Dehumanization

Due to the incipient tendency to isolation of the modern individual associated with technological abuse, the sex industry has turned this business into a niche market under the excuse of being able to cover the sexual needs of the plaintiffs. The users of these services do not go only to these brothels to give free rein to their most frightening fantasies, but every day is more common the exclusive purchase of these dolls as an object of company. Prices can range between 1000 and 25,000 dollars depending on the demands and personal tastes of buyers.

When we speak of dehumanization, its analysis should be deepened in the underlying social question as a consequence of the alienation caused by technology, together with the disappearance of ethical values ​​and the loss of sensibility. In this case, under the prism of sexuality and in relation to women, we could speak of a specific dehumanization produced by the objectification, reification and outrageous hyper-sexualisation to which the female population is subjected.

The advance of technology and civilization cannot ensure human dignity under the acceptance of women as objects.

The most efficient way to dehumanize people is by converting them into tools where the important thing would be their function through instrumentalization. Women throughout history have been instrumentalized; or what is the same, dehumanized through forced labor such as prostitution or reproduction, being used exclusively for their ability to produce and not for their needs. The fact that today we are talking about sex dolls leads us to consider a future where humanity – in its broadest set – could be at risk from the loss of identity, thus nullifying their capacity for self-determination and the principles of ethics as a common value within of a globalized phenomenon in which some people do not take into account others if they cannot be used as an object / thing.

The mere justification for the industrialization and commercialization of these sex dolls entails the acceptance that human beings can be stripped of their humanitarian traits.

As a result of dehumanization, the human being sees limited reflection capacity as a rational mechanism, thus reducing the emotional capacities necessary for the development of social skills such as empathy, cohabitation and volitional suitability, being the main causes of complete dehumanization.

We can accept the opening of brothels open to people having sex with dolls as a masculine claim, but what we cannot and should never accept, is the objectification of the human being if we want to build a fair and egalitarian society perfectly prepared for a regenerative evolution. But make no mistake; turning a woman into a sex doll is turning half of the population into something.